Red wing boots logo
![red wing boots logo red wing boots logo](https://shop.r10s.jp/sugarltd/cabinet/shoes/redwing/rw-2991-a.jpg)
Both appear to be chrome tanned and oil tanned.It’s really worth emphasizing that Thorogood also uses speed hooks and a leather pull tab, so it’s way easier to get on and off, making for an argument that the Thorogood is more “functional.” In the sole section below, you’ll also find a few other details that support this claim.īut all in all, the biggest differences when you look at them is the stitching, logo, flag, and speed hooks. Thorogood’s a louder boot, in other words. Thorogood not only uses bright white stitching, but there’s also a line of three stitches running along from the top of the counter to the end of the eyelet panel, in addition to a Thorogood logo on the heel, another on the tongue, and an American flag. (Yes, this is the most superficial part of the comparison.) It makes for a more muted appearance that folks who like simpler wardrobes might prefer. While both boots have triple stitching along the side and double stitching on the counter, Red Wing uses contrast stitching, meaning only one of the stitches is bright white.
![red wing boots logo red wing boots logo](https://www.cho.co.uk/images/red-wing-8-harvester-boot-p12532-445845_image.jpg)
![red wing boots logo red wing boots logo](https://www.redwingsafety.com/assets/images/reskin2017/redwing-trademark.png)
(It’s derived from an Algonquian word from Virginia, makasin.) Relative to service boots, the style is meant to give you some more flex in the foot and protect the toe box from scuffs.Īesthetically - we’re just talking about appearances for now - Red Wing has a more subtle look. “Moc toe” is short for mocassin, by the way, a style borrowed from traditional Native American shoes. OK, let’s put those similarities in bullet point form: